Here is working example on Win7: stdout: make string! 255 call/wait/output rejoin [to-local-file system/options/path %\extract.exe " mypassword"] stdout
I remember that CALL supports rebol style file names, but it sometimes fail to run the app. So to put TO-LOCAL-FILE is good. But in this example extract.exe is a Win32 application that outputs to stdout, not a real DOS app. This might be a difference.
anything, so I guess the parameters being used by win-call when the launch process is being done are different.
Did Carl release the CALL source at one point, to get input and help on it?
Only talked about that, I think
Anybody ever tried signing an encapped REBOL binary (R2) for the Mac? With Gatekeeper coming distribution of REBOL application will be dead in the water. OTOH: if we can get it working, I see a productivity boon for a whole suite of Desktop "Apps".
Wow. I hadn't seen Gatekeeper. My first thought is that it's less about security than it is about control and revenue, but I could be wrong. Security is good. It seems clear that as things change, "legacy " doesn't mean "really old" anymore.
Any additional information what this is exactly about please? (I know of a Gatekeeper script to password protect/hide a directory)
Gatekeeper is their new security system, to keep out malware (and maybe anything else they don't want).